Docu v/d week #141 – Grasp The Nettle

Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:02:45 +0200, Mr Blue wrote:
> GNU PUBLIC LICENSE

> http://sourceforge.net/projects/celestia/
> http://www.theeinsteinfile.com/

> *Change log: Revision 002  July 4th 2014.
> Added dimension chapter, using a computer for grammar now.

> *Introduction: This book is called The Universe For Dummies and
> Retards, I write a chapter whenever I like. It is not finished. But
> it is free as long as you comply with GNU PUBLIC LICENSE you are free
> to use, modify or fork it, but remember, your obligations are to
> include this unmodified text/book with it. English is not my native
> language so it will contain grammar mistakes.

> Chapters:
> *A Matter of Time
> *Cosmic After Glow, A Look Over The Horizon
> *Terminal Gravity
> *Dimensions and The Matrix

> *A Matter of Time

> We see the universe as it was, not as is. We observe over 13 billion
> years. But is it right to say the universe is this age? And I say
> no. What we see is the remnants of what was, the universe existed far
> more earlier. We are reasoning from our point of view without taking
> time dilation into account. For example in extreme gravity situations
> like on our own Sun time progresses much differently. Let me explain,
> take a spaceship and keep accelerating it with 1g, until it
> approaches light speed it will generate gravity of 1g and for the
> observer time on the spaceship keeps slowing down as Lorentz
> contraction and Time contraction become more relevant the spaceship
> can exist way longer in time-space-continuum compared to the
> observer. Again I ask you to calculate the real age of the Sun if you
> compare it with artificially gravity like the spaceship going faster
> and faster and this way creating artificial gravity. Your conclusion
> could be the Sun is much younger from the point of the Sun’s view. In
> reality but not for the observer, the Sun is burning out real fast
> until it fuses into an Iron star and it will die. For us humanity we
> see the Sun as an observer burning out slowly as a high speed movie
> slowed down. This is a Paradox. I gave it lot of thought though and
> my conclusion is that eventually we can no longer in any possible way
> say how old the universe is. End of part1/142

> *Cosmic After Glow, A Look Over The Horizon

> Imagine you were at sea and were looking for other ships. You would
> soon realize that you see over the horizon since the top of other
> ships are seen before the whole ship shows up. Early ships had a nest
> to look as far over the horizon as possible. It were men at sea to be
> the first to see and conclude that Earth is curved. Now imagine a
> beautiful day. No matter where you look, the sky looks homogeneous.
> Many scientist believe we live in a curved Universe, and I agree.
> Just as in the example of ships at sea, if you just look far enough,
> you will look over the Universe it’s horizon. Scientist call it the
> Cosmic Afterglow. Does it belong to our Universe since our Universe
> its inception? And I do not concur. I assume the cosmic afterglow is
> similar to Earth its horizon. It is bound to our Universe yes, but it
> manifests its self because of external reasons. There would not be a
> sky without the Sun. There would not be a Universe without something
> unknown. The only prove is that we live in a curved space. And we are
> looking over our Universe its Horizon. End of part2/142

> *Terminal Gravity
> It is important you know how artificial gravity is created. I t is
> described in the chapter A Matter of Time. From Einstein you derive
> that you can only create gravity artificially until light speed is
> approached. With energy you thus so create gravity. However the
> opposite is true too. With matter clustering you create gravity
> although now in natural form. Suppose your car broke down. You ask
> people to push your car then you set your car in its first
> transmission gear, give some gas. The people who pushed your car
> created a very small force, yes indeed gravity in your back, for this
> it took these people energy, the people pushing your car needed food
> which is matter that contains energy also. Matter needs energy to
> manifest itself. But energy needs matter to manifest itself too.
> They are needing each other. Now imagine a very unimaginable big star
> that collapses because there is no more energy for fusion to protect
> itself against the clustering of matter. Scientists call it black
> holes. Why do they suck matter? Because for gravity to exist either
> energy or matter needs to be obtained. The only way for a black hole
> to continue existence is draining energy to maintain a natural
> terminal gravitational field, which is obtained from external
> obtained matter. This GRAVITUS IN TERMINUS cannot exceed some
> limitations like light speed is proven to be finite too. Inside black
> holes there simply is maximum gravity. Now ask yourself, does Anti
> Gravity exists? We observe an expanding universe, how can something
> so powerful like a black hole be over won by something as simple as
> an unknown force? I assume we observe hereby that Anti Gravity
> manifests itself on a UNIVERSE WIDE scale. I assume that Anti Gravity
> is the most powerful force in the Universe. Assume Earth its gravity
> suddenly would turn into anti gravity. The whole planet would go Big
> Bang until ANTIGRAVITUS IN TERMINUS is reached and matter of which
> earth consisted could cluster again. Fortunately we are unable to
> create this most powerful force I could ever possibly think of. But
> there is observable evidence in our ever expanding universe its
> assumed momentum, where its accelerating expansion proves its not
> momentum or inertia/ertia. Have we discovered Anti Gravity? As
> Stephen Hawking predicts this theory describes that eventually black
> holes dissipate and simply cease to exist too. Just because light
> speed is finite, THERE IS A MAXIMUM TERMINAL GRAVITY. I do not break
> any rule of science. Einstein explained it all and so did Stephen
> Hawking. For example scientists world wide say DARK ENERGY is
> responsible for the universe its expansion, but as I explained,
> energy needs matter and matter needs energy to manifest themselves.
> It is thus for me reasonable to assume the same is true for DARK
> ENERGY and DARK MATTER needing each other to create the force that
> expands our universe. ANTI GRAVITY is not simply a force in the
> opposite direction of gravity like the gravity field of earth. Why
> bother with formulas. End of part3/142

> *Dimensions and The Matrix
> We all experience multiple dimensions. We can move along X, Y and Z.
> However for this we need time, T. This gives us D(X,Y,Z,T) where D
> simply stands for Dimensions. However for those who know about linear
> algebra and Matrix Transformations know that to make it all work you
> need one dimension higher to multiply one Matrix with another. I
> assume you understand linear algebra. Assume you are sitting in your
> chair in front of your television. Now walk inside your room, you are
> now transforming in D(X,Y,Z,T), when you spin yourself or look around
> you even do rotation in D(X,Y,Z,T). Now go back to your television.
> You are at the same origin aren’t you? NO you ARE NOT!!!, look at
> your television, for example it had turned on Dr. Phil he is now
> talking to another guy, meanwhile the Earth rotated, our Solar System
> is following its momentum, EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED IN D(X,Y,Z,T). The
> SAME PLACE ONLY EXISTS IN THEORY. This is CALLED THE MATRIX. Or in
> other words, our Universe. And it all started easy you always thought
> you came back at the same place, however this is impossible. For
> being able to transform and rotate in D(X,Y,Z,T) according to the
> linear algebra Matrices we multiply with each other another Dimension
> needs to be introduced, I simply call it U. So we experience and live
> in D(X,Y,Z,T) where T simply is Time, we now introduce D(X,Y,Z,T,U).
> For humans this is difficult to understand, however simply feed this
> into the Unity Matrix with a diagonal of yes indeed X,Y,Z,T,U simply
> being 1. This is called setting Unity for the World Matrix, where the
> World Matrix simply is the origin of our Universe. Now feed in the
> data of our Sun, Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter and so on,
> simply only their D(X,Y,Z,T). And now you can simulate our Solar
> System inside a computer simply by the introduction of Dimension U.
> But remember in reality we have no control over all these Dimensions,
> THEY ARE GONE FOREVER!!! D(X,Y,Z,T) simply exist for a Planck
> interrupt, the shortest moment of existence. I do however only know
> we need Dimension(U) to simply exist and live, rotate, transform,
> without Dimension(U) there would only be D(X,Y,Z) and for being able
> to live in these Dimensions you would still need D(T). Under to live
> I mean to transform, to rotate, to exist. Forget all those boring
> linear algebra calculations, simply make the computer do the dirty
> work, there is no need to understand Dimension D(U), we simply need
> it, without it… no Universe. However this makes you wonder will we
> one day understand Dimension D(U)? I really recommend you to install
> Celestia, it uses all this technology. It does not look beautiful, as
> those pretty science fiction renders, but at least it is as real as
> it gets. Simply start by looking for the moon, with your mouse and
> arrows, right click the Moon, and in the pop up menu choose what ever
> you want.

> *The great nothing, The Void.
> It will take the me a moment to complete the information. Matter that
> comes from the void only exists for a short moment, together with
> their antiparticle they appear from the great nothingness, the
> greater its speed the longer it survives, but they are tangled and
> destroy each-other. Date of observation 1996 doing physics. I will
> study it. This chapter is severely delayed.